<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Quick Tip: Do not use the template chooser module (unless you have a very good reason)</title>
		<description>Comments for Quick Tip: Do not use the template chooser module (unless you have a very good reason) at http://www.howtojoomla.net , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:16:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-727</link>
			<description>I'm still not convinced. If you look at any of the template companies, they use their own custom scripts because they like to flesh out the content differently for each template they have. The template chooser would be of no use in that scenario.

For minor color changes, I can see that as being a possibility. However, a lot of people use javascript color switchers in their templates to accomplish the same effect. - Cory</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:02:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-726</link>
			<description>Everything is useful, you just need to think with a bit more of a open mind.  

Potential uses are:
-for a Joomla demo site that you are trying to sell joomla templates on.
-copy your template and make minor color edits so if users like blue, instead of pink they can change it.

You get my drift. - mr knowitall</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:47:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-685</link>
			<description>thats right. who needs dozen of templates and dozen of module/component/mambot which must be changed/positioned for each template. it's useless  :D - tonii</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:04:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-419</link>
			<description>I can think of a good reason to use it.
Use it for template variation instead of implementing various color scheme / header images / flash menu / etc. via coding.

It is much less confusing when you make many copies of single template than make one template than can be change.

Another good reason is users tend to see the thumbnail pics before changing the template.

just my 2 cents - Wam</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:48:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-387</link>
			<description>If the 'Template chooser' would transform to a 'CSS chooser', now that would be useful. - Jon</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:20:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-373</link>
			<description>Pretty usefull advice , especially for newbies ! The only valid reason to use the template chooser module, as I can remember, could be &quot;Template showcase&quot; made for customer. After the customer makes its mind about the layout, the module should be unpublished. As much as I know, this module will not be part of the Joomla 1.5 core package. - Pingvin</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 06:16:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-364</link>
			<description>Great advice Cory on many levels - mostly on the need to &quot;design&quot; the site BEFORE choosing the template.  Now I just have to figure out how to do that! - Lookinglass</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:11:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.howtojoomla.net/content/view/58/5/#comment-360</link>
			<description>if A webb site needs an e-mail address what type of site is it - t. p. callaway.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:40:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
